Okay? Now. Take a deep breath and calm down.
The video is a beautifully filmed and narrated work of fiction. Inspired by real events, but fiction nonetheless. Yes, there are Humboldt squid in the waters and beaches of La Jolla. But is it true that "an undersea earthquake has driven these predators close to the shore"? No. Is it likely that local marine creatures "sense an alien presence"--other than divers shining lights in their nocturnal faces? Probably not. And the most important question of all . . .
"WILL ANYTHING SURVIVE THE NIGHT???"
I'm pretty sure there are still octopuses, horn sharks, and divers in the water, along with the squid, so it would appear that the answer is a dull and unequivocal yes.
Humboldt (a.k.a. jumbo, but not giant) squid have been swimming in California waters and washing up on Southern California beaches every summer for years. The biggest stranding events were in 2002 and 2005 and received abundant media coverage, but minor strandings in the intervening years passed pretty much under the radar. This summer's stranding has (so far) been one of the more modest. So why all the fanfare?
I don't know for sure, any more than I know for sure why the squid stranded in the first place, but here's a plausible scenario. Several squid strand during the week, but not many people notice or think much of it. Come Saturday morning, not only is it the beginning of the weekend, but an earthquake has just jostled people out of bed, so now there are more people on the beach and they're more alert. They notice the squid, and with the earthquake fresh in their minds, they connect the two. The media jump on it. What a great headline!
By the time some responsible reporters decide to interview scientists, the quake has been inextricably tied to the squid. The actual content of the story is now debunking the connection, but the headline still reads Humboldt Squid Wash Ashore in La Jolla After Quake. Even National Geographic asks: Dozens of Jumbo Squid Beached After Quake--Coincidence? Please, Natty Geo, don't make it a question. It is an answer. Coincidence!
Now people are excited about squid, and some recreational divers decide to hang out with them in the water, rather than on the beach. Humboldt squid are active, inquisitive sorts, and sure, sometimes they can be a little grabby. BAM! Now we have a whole new sensational angle on the story. The Associated Press article many news outlets are using is called Jumbo Squid Invade San Diego Shores, Spook Divers and I just can't resist peering through a few scientific holes:
- Folks always want to describe the Humboldt squid beak as "razor-sharp." I really wish they wouldn't. For one thing, it is a classic cliché, and for another, it's plain wrong. Just from handling them, it's quite easy to cut oneself on razors and nearly impossible to cut oneself on squid beaks. Certainly, the squid could break your skin with its beak if it chose to bite--but so could a human with its teeth, and no one ever calls human teeth "razor-sharp."
- It's misleading to describe Humboldt squid as "deep-sea giants" and imply they're not usually seen near the surface. Their natural habit, in both Mexico and California, is to migrate daily between surface and deep waters--most likely following their prey.
- Speaking of clichés, I know I start to sound like a broken record, but really, I have never heard anyone in Mexico refer to the Humboldt squid as diablo rojo (red devil). It's just calamar gigante. Boring but true!
- "Roger Uzun, a veteran scuba diver and amateur underwater videographer, swam with a swarm of the creatures for about 20 minutes and said they appeared more curious than aggressive. The animals taste with their tentacles, he said, and seemed to be touching him and his wet suit to determine if he was edible." Emphasis mine, because I don't know of any evidence that squid get chemosensory input (smell or taste) from their arms or tentacles. Go ahead and quote him saying he thinks they're more curious than aggressive, but not that they taste with their tentacles. The first statement is a valid personal impression, the second is scientific misinformation. Remember, this guy is a diver, not a biologist. In fact, he's the one who made that gorgeous (but fictitious) Trouble in Paradise video.
Now that we've come full circle, I am done being a cantankerous wet blanket of a scientist. So let me tell you my favorite true thing that I learned from all this media coverage:
"According to local news reports, some beachgoers in the city of La Jolla attempted to throw the squid back into the water to save them from circling seagulls."
Isn't that sweet? Despite all the talk of red devils and carnivorous calamari, here is proof positive of human empathy for other living creatures. Even though they are slimy weird aliens, not cute fuzzy mammals, people weren't out there taunting the squid, stepping on them, or cutting them up. They were trying to save them.
I think that is awesome.
Recent Comments